About Us | Advertise | FAQ | Contact  | RSS Feed
Subscribe to this feed
ADVANCE for Audiologists RSS Feed
Search
Login | Sign Up

Current Issue

Subscriptions are FREE to Qualified Audiologists


Features

In-Your-Face Dressing


View Comments (4)Print ArticleEmail Article

The dot-com revolution brought with it a new dress code as young millionaires with more money than style decreed suits were dead and ties were an abomination. It was the birth of "in-your-face" dressing that decreed, "I make so much money I don't have to dress to impress anyone."

Such arrogance foretold of mass bankruptcies in later years.

Nevertheless, money talks, and the fashion victims listened and followed. Casual Friday became de rigueur, even in the most conservative establishments. Once-formal bankers, investment brokers and lawyers now loosened up on Fridays. In time, it became a bother to dress formally and "business casual" and "corporate casual" were born. This attire soon looked more like "corporate casualty," since it could not quite be defined and was sorely abused.

The recent successor to business casual is the "in-your-face" dressing that announces, "I'm so hip and with-it that I don't have to wear a boring business suit or a tie." These professionals are commonly seen in a black silk Armani T-shirt and expensive sport jacket. For women, the look consists of suggestive attire, chandelier earrings and too much makeup. There are problems other than the "in-your-face" message that this look sends.

For one thing, it easily creates the impression that you are "slick," and maybe headed for Las Vegas instead of the boardroom. Some women have even observed that this look can sometimes give the impression of being a womanizer. In either case, credibility goes down dramatically. And if you have a slim build, something else happens. Normally when a sport jacket is worn with a shirt and a tie, these garments fill out the neck area of the jacket so that it doesn't pull away from the shirt at the neck--a real No-No if you want to look polished and professional. However, with a thin T-shirt, very often the jacket may not fit snugly at the neck, causing the neck to look frail or weak.

Other "in-your-face" looks include inappropriate ties that suggest, "I'm so successful that I can wear Mickey Mouse or baby pink ties to the boardroom" or women who refuse to wear makeup or proper business attire to the office.

Beware of this stance. Menswear designer Joseph Abboud recently booted two investment bankers out of his New York office because they were not wearing ties. Abboud said, "They blew it because they offended me by being too casual." Ultimately, casual attire suggests a casual attitude. However, "in-your-face" attire suggests a smug attitude, which most people resent.

When a person of the stature and power of Donald Trump takes an "in-your-face" stance and wears a pink tie in New York City, it sends the false signal that such a tie must be a Power Tie. It is not; not even in Palm Beach or other cities in the Deep South, where pastel ties are popular and accepted. Pastel ties are for the country club or dining out with friends. In real "power" situations, they cause a man to look less powerful.

Of course, powerful men often live by the credo, "Do as I say, not as I do." In other words, for them, power trumps decorum. Unfortunately, "copycats" of this "in-your-face" dressing who do not live in the Deep South risk having their credibility decreased.

True professionals know instinctively that in order to be taken seriously, a serious appearance is required. They dress to impress, even though this attitude may be more subliminal than conscious. Most people make an effort when calling on an important client because they know it affects the outcome. Their attitude is positive, and their appearance should also be positive. In-your-face attire is smug or arrogant.

We had a brief foray into "madness" with the dot-com revolution, and during that time "monsters" were created in the working environment. Outraged employees protest today that they don't want to return to formal business attire. They love corporate casual and simply do not want to be bothered with dressing up again. It is still arrogant and in-your-face to think that your comfort is more important than your client's attitude toward you.

Young "Gen-Y" female employees wonder why they are not permitted to wear their suggestive club attire to the office. Satin and lacy stretch camisoles fall into an entirely different category than in-your-face attire. Pop stars spawned this look, and what young business professionals forget is that they are not pop stars. They are business professionals who must represent their company in a businesslike manner. As one male executive responded, "We don't sell that."

A recent university study concluded that females who wear suggestive attire to the office lose all credibility when they are in management positions. Only females in lower positions with little hope of promotion were not judged negatively in suggestive attire. In reality, if women are informed of the negativity of suggestive attire and refuse to change, it would be as in-your-face as a baby pink Mickey Mouse tie.

Sandy Dumont, The Image Architect, is executive director of the Impression Strategies Institute and is a professional speaker with the National Speakers Association. She conducts keynotes and breakout workshops. Get a free book and 5-part Image Course at www.TheimageArchitect.com. For more information: 757-627-6669.


 

I find this article to be a breath of fresh air... finally, someone is willing to stand up and say that business should require business attire. I'm surprised by the negative comments. If you look at photos or movies from 50 or 60 years ago, you will see that--aside from manual labor occupations (which are not the subject of the article) -nearly everyone wore business attire to work, even if they had a "dirty" job. And I doubt that any of the commenters would do business with someone who didn't bother to look and smell clean, regardless of their credentials. Dress and hygiene are two aspects of the same thing... appearance. Both matter.

Christi October 29, 2009



Many people wear lab coats/ jackets because it makes them look like scientists or doctors and gives them the appearance of knowledge. If they don't have the knowledge, then they are sending the wrong message.
What is the purpose of a necktie? Before central heat it was to keep the neck warm, later with plaids or different colors it might be associated with a certain clan or military group. I think it sends a message of stuffiness and the inability to "get your hands dirty" when it's time to work. I think most people are hiding behind their uniform.

george October 28, 2009



This author seems almost silly with her "no pink for men" comments. Her logic seems to be pink is feminine and feminine is less powerful. So men who wear pink are less powerful. Sexist thinking at a very fundamental level. I perceive men who wear pink to be powerful because they have the backbone to defy rigid gender/color stereotypes. I hope Advance chooses more enlightened authors in the future.

Alan October 28, 2009
Clearwater, FL



Read all comments (4) >>


     

Email: *

Email, first name, comment and security code are required fields; all other fields are optional. With the exception of email, any information you provide will be displayed with your comment.

First * Last
Name:
Title Field Facility
Work:
City State
Location:

Comments: *
To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the below image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Captcha
Enter the security code below: *

Fields marked with an * are required.

 

Search Jobs

Zip

Go